An LMS delivers and tracks modules, but it doesn't build competence. Maestro designs 70/20/10 learning paths and their content from your procedures — anchored in the real task.
An LMS (learning management system) delivers modules, enrols learners and tracks completion: catalogue, reporting, regulatory training, SCORM. Useful for administering training at scale.
Its limit: the LMS doesn't build competence. The content is often generic, disconnected from the real task and from the procedures, and quickly out of date. You stack up modules that have been "viewed", not know-how acquired on the job.
| Criterion | Traditional LMS | Maestro |
|---|---|---|
| Objective | Deliver and track modules | Design on-the-job competence |
| Source of content | To be produced separately | Generated from your procedures |
| Link with procedures | Weak, manual | Native: procedure → learning path |
| Learning format | Generic e-learning modules | 70/20/10, blended, on the job |
| Updating when the procedure changes | Manual | Linked to the source |
| Delivery & tracking | Yes | Yes — Sinfony Learning Suite or your LMS |
Maestro designs the learning paths (70/20/10 model) and their content directly from your procedures, then has them produced as videos with Hoctav. Delivery and tracking rely on the Sinfony Learning Suite — or on your existing LMS, which Maestro feeds with content that is at last anchored in real work.
No: Maestro designs the training (learning paths + content) from your procedures. Delivery and tracking run through the Sinfony Learning Suite or your existing LMS.
Yes. Maestro produces content anchored in your procedures, which you deliver through your LMS.
A model where 70% of learning happens on the job, 20% through peers and 10% in formal settings. Maestro designs learning paths in that spirit, focused on the actual task.
Maestro designs; Hoctav produces the videos and tutorials.
A fixed-scope Flash Audit: you walk away with concrete simplification leads, produced by Maestro.
Book a Flash Audit